BORROW
copyrighted work
Book TV
October 28, 2012 7:00am-8:30am EDT on CSPAN2

0 comments
Clips viewed 71 times

Richard Sander & Stuart Taylor Education. (2012) 'Mismatch How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It's Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won't Admit It.' New.

Broadcast Summary

00:00
hard question prevent medicated thorny suffering face suicide alcoholism brilliantly today artists many much might written possibly raises things alive
00:30
book wrote called washington mississippi integration mar dead paul city long sons post mack name 1996 civil books study south topics author robert living rights written vietnam previous reporter architect published
01:00
lot feel pick thank subjects hendrickson ol paul miss book name bonet james booktv recent having history joining cultural meredith hemingway biography resonance university
01:30
action affirmative believe arguments university minorities half much hour oral talk thank texas goals hurts taylor agreed sander versus fisher stuart initial
02:00
book great happening published sponsoring officially bit try idea cato talk event thank start today roger found relate little kickoff central tomorrow
02:30
cato policy security community organizing particularly lot big book glad 1980s stood tight issue aware leave issues reform mostly trying school became values social become analyze whether thinking graduate evenings
03:00
subsidies receiving happening published revelation interesting idea book paid part class great thing found people debate seemed policy nobody middle talking largest thought benefits
03:30
figure actually approach empirical interested willingness let sort kato cato much facts meant thing items debate policy trying always analogy figured success without politics dynamics
04:00
deal action affirmative greatest security analogous 30 fix 80s work much easy ever many later issue peace today early years racial senses degree harder social imagine problem problems
04:30
interested school progress later deal mentioned mismatch lingering law may innocently working administrative got harder question roger hope issue
05:00
chance students happening graduating admissions preferences 45 90 50 bar long sort meant sense might large worked welcome passing mismatch something admitting important graduated
05:30
law students database developed admitting references los hard wasn test 2004 2005 went paper better wouldn school gotten looking degrees started schools angeles without relevant smoothly outcomes actually
06:00
law large school students especially preferences spt poor bulk scale group black issue great third found traits couple points hundred context african problem minority american starting generally receiving discusses graduating nationally
06:30
collective preferences instinctive institutional substantially unwillingness lot bar many lives great large people helped really struck article passing majority response reaction affecting supposedly
07:00
trying interested foundation preference empirically institutions law hard find data 2007 fact school became already someone broadly country restrict received contacted prospects
07:30
done research scientists independent commissioned institutions lot find vast based known stated period likely blacks partly wanted effort social various problem efforts overtime journals majority problems although together excellent publishing
08:00
preference large receives virginia university engineering less call than major color found study likely blacks whites chance larger college degrees receive science dropping students
08:30
large receive mismatch experiment academically predominantly low voters grades passed decide become affects biggest happened students inclined academic academics economics professors california preference university proposition
09:00
number gone blacks degrees university preferences 70 30 half gpas went years dozen cares clear played within racial system anyone banned systems bachelor receiving hispanics extremely
09:30
ucla berkeley outcome admitted improvement preferences fewer rates every racial higher school column leading critics success african problem afforded actually students dramatic americans virtually
10:00
book students reputation illustrates integration universities four paid many race talk elite admit things across effect graphic cascade national campuses minority increased neutrality
10:30
admit schools third second fourth preferences tier means top far used pick start elite tiers ladder largest african colleges hispanic students academic american ironically preference achievement
11:00
preferences contexts important university universities significantly led jerk knee helps often worst lower third second couple leaders reasons defense explain effects moderate mismatch
11:30
second preferences universities requirements institutions significantly 25 much used pool tears state means large highly absorb effect special schools america colleges minority students talented disparity selective aggravated
12:00
talk another minutes prominent schools thing shown education research discussion affects three sign preference mismatch racial interest diversity things means higher
12:30
affects students moderated diversity documented preferences low less self book much doubt peers study large admit found likely raises grades believe research socially distance admitted academic interact
13:00
carefully diversity vulnerable preference demonstrate institutional arms part fits span2 large looked threat nicely talking various wanting serious problem effects findings research mismatch problems behavior
13:30
higher education institutions preference solidarity nonstarter deal find loss pull paths mason mercy follow george regime behind lineup another uniform effects different difficult sustained
14:00
standards preferences preference documented complicitous implementing past done find court loose rigid racial things across connor larger supreme justice issuing schools applied enforce colleges research
14:30
book tried write vacation interesting problem mechanically router readership scale dispassionate policy accessible 2003 judge important let passionate decision broader whether
15:00
thank author outside succeeded co copy professor audience bookstore book hear otherwise purchase stuart sander mismatch services online local taylor
15:30
practicing journalist nonresident institution contributing occasionally law free focus books legal basic lance taylor lawyer issues author writes editor policy school stuart current journal lecturer national focusing stanford brookings published
16:00
law court media supreme university constitutional cut york times lawyer writer please school wilbur stuart senior writing concern welcome harvard attorney graduate lecturer reporter american princeton correspondent distinguished
16:30
case book talk heartfelt relevance opportunity bit etc much focus court thank taylor accept thanks little giving please supreme evidence mismatch applause
17:00
book case issues solutions preferences transparent size suit focus texas racial pretty fisher making brought abigail focuses started overall student problem similar reducing admitted basically university preference
17:30
10 top texas pretty school roughly 90 law high close class grades racial gotten called austin thought average students admitted university automatically
18:00
court texas lower precedent preference university got law etc less fine test sued knew lost went apply state saying people courts scores supreme obliged federal hirsute district strictly admitted qualified graduated
18:30
plan university michigan modeled followed preferences law love held 2003 court hated texas racial uphold enough upheld strike choice school appeals obliged justice closely
19:00
case court supreme composition preferences extraordinary 16 much seven early finds likely racial uphold strike matter become greater thought circuit history justices anything disagreed important president precedents
19:30
racial preferences preference university long camouflaged complicated gave holy word list 2003 index since texas water cases light large green whole people worked 10 fairly making outside changed beneath holistic top academic sprinkle applying
20:00
personal achievement born race index hispanic many emphasize often white achievements black call texas components consider asian literally account thing little
20:30
tell texas racial numbers different university best call 2009 pitch story scale makes little campus finger groups 10 recent arrive compare looking outside whether top whatever entering freshman accepted academic operation seen preference comparison credentials
21:00
score gaps mean scale black points 80 little 2400 amine tiebreaker asian main idea withstand 390 racial enormous 467 finger white
21:30
gaps problems litigation standpoint academically universities end big amy true focus wreck means lower large almost likely fisher racial pretty country mismatch students struggle analysis complaint elsewhere described
22:00
university skeptical preferences traditional distinctions discriminated law help okay case court black white texas cases third number strike school talking claimed greeter approach students michigan overrule
22:30
racial really supposed preferences articulated alternatives 10 lot need size plan case race books avoid texas raise limit connor pursue remain abuses justice greater neutral enforce duration resorting diversity principles university
23:00
racial court argument proportion composition unconstitutional top try goal plan close favor state texas haven mirror closer cannot gotten another meaning although explicit statewide balancing individual population university preferences
23:30
years 25 maybe racial supposed proportionality 16 50 end far eye gone next nine phase within people except another intends decades forever anything anywhere statewide principle preparing perpetuate university preference preferences universities
24:00
mass every racial critical different systematically isn long years group texas class people whites blacks system groups trying compete hundred science classes channels dropping manifests intention producing university preferencess
24:30
20 average research universities demonstrated undergraduates law rick full plan 2003 point asian court since black racial system struck points supreme instead schools brooder hispanic michigan explicit mentioned university particularly
25:00
struck ballistic consistent university preferences substituted lot used seem full case point grade court racial little system connor spirit places larger points supreme justice suppose decision happened michigan explicit
25:30
racial preferences students suggests principle unconstitutional gpa 204 key gaps mean group black white quote large argue extent stated unduly scores points router elected another members schools evidence
26:00
harm texas unduly excluded university preferences abby race worse group black might shows every whites racial asians fisher strong misled records members evidence academic thinking students foremost admitted hispanic primarily qualified otherwise
26:30
black hispanic class likely students preferences top find race based there might stock lucky large bottom talking records student usually graduate admitted academic concealed preference outstanding
27:00
racial large remedy protection preferences ban transparency fair cure full case gaps total court adopt roger works people system groups fisher strong measure problem research minority students complain favorite admitted consumer disclosure
27:30
lawyers doctors children preference preferences intelligent cab kept socio black white ahead second racial better secret policy public school larger farmers drivers routine matters getting example whatever economic admitted hispanic qualified
28:00
better economic inequality conclusion seamstresses egalitarianism hook book stop worse thank folks gives class roger people stated system asians stuart making working america operates contrary applause
28:30
hand card never carrying stuart found libertarians conservatives pass moderate least taylor read anything issue sander couldn intro confused event rick
29:00
clay roger president regulatory alan affirmative opportunity hear case side laws civil legal equal issues impact center rights either action higher general focuses critics counsel created arising morrison business book problems including education
29:30
general attorney assistant deputy division positions held civil legal roger office please law reagan second acting policy former school bush rights justice several welcome highest natural clay graduate including resources associate solicitor department yale environment administration
30:00
thank book taylor cato terrific nice institute applause wonderful sander rick introduction writing today much stuart inviting preys makes
30:30
people contribution everybody extremely important unprecedented buy ways book sort read lots many thing family charts debate issues copies written friends readable diagrams multiple
31:00
book write terrific smart friends something really particularly anyway brave people authors got don
31:30
pal around people reporters racial frequently true preferences academics little bit humorous stuart rick academic personally much talk
32:00
book perfect line career put nobody brave reason however great main stuff call
32:30
done balance explain someday abolition university racial admissions text preferences begin reading area law
33:00
choosing tomorrow activity subjected embarrassing discrimination let act 1964 read race civil court title color origin states ground united rights supreme program picking national
means talking constitution receiving assistance differently much race mean color court title origin really fisher supreme happens federal abigail treated national disputed financial
34:00
protection constitution amendment standards fourteenth guarantees lot law 1981 room seems legal quote equal whole little pretty wiggle outlaw federal section forward purpose statutes separate straight
34:30
exception really quarters racial three includes mean forward straight banned court categorical area college discrimination carve ban tuition supreme words fairly
35:00
must something nuclear york principle law compelling helps argument city undeniable discrimination bomb somebody really search clearly identify racial pretty strong
35:30
college somewhat likely rehearsed admission interracial discrimination racial
36:00
kids benefits university african educational white something preferences arguing overwhelming among american conversations asian students compelling latino texas
36:30
court social principle recognized supreme ridiculous scientists really nondiscrimination indeed reason exception true buys
37:00
benefits educational court disputed increasingly happens jurisprudence bear education mind important marginal improvement
37:30
got costs racial inherent discrimination engaging liabilities weighed something right involved consider compelling
38:00
discrimination racial resentment disturbing personally consequence sets heart moral legal unfair passes little better comment whitney creates sections students websites allowing political qualified president guideposts
38:30
academic excellence compromises stigmatizes discriminate beneficiaries body eyes lowers victim future called mission grading quality fosters overall removes student mindset clients creates pressure teachers incentive employers encourages separatism classmates university graduation
39:00
encourages activities membership minorities competitive academically much ones many among blood ethnic within racial needed savory school breeds college favored schools african deciding attitude softball involved officials establish hypocrisy americans
39:30
mismatch chapter addition lot problems problem stronger giving irrefutable mention documentation seems touches add listened real verse
40:00
happy notes benefits note educational random preferences interracial might conversations seems let racial wrap sort
40:30
people recently country nonsense changing discriminated 40 50 end jim lot ago crow seem face years black white living system reason america talking
41:00
minority americans somebody something according preferences 30 act ago age four born seem long 1994 civil years group white larger census rights latest latinos anymore largest african describe
41:30
growing americans group fastest african minority racial rapidly groups major ethnicity people 12 race president rate check neither box asian white
42:00
people country little ancestors check according worse section based frequently treat questionnaire legal regime skin seems better box supports silly color
42:30
talking racial really minutes educational anybody conversation disparity justification slavery debate believes believe favor benefits let academics tell arguing
rates federal isn particular figures compelling interests disparities latest illegitimacy wedlock last justification birth slavery births government twice week racial
43:30
72 born indians latinas asians 53 african high american whites americans 21 pretty wedlock 66
44:00
10 latinos minority racial seven typically blacks american preference 17 discriminated lined figures underrepresented words indians accident called three people fewer
44:30
thank lerner applause different alan morrison indicator education hear problem well preferences social terms racial real whatever groups crime fixed
45:00
law public students dean school interest career wide family george profit worked ways pursue service outside careers sectors morrison legal creating possible seek bringing programs education associate firms assisting positions find washington government university encouraging range responsible traditional opportunities fund
45:30
law class including litigation settlements unrepresented nader fail ralph legal suing cases open areas reform co argued comply rights action 1972 powers members 25 founded opening various citizen years forcing protect 20 agencies directed involved consumers group profession government separation rest
46:00
virginia american commercial separation state university legislative board feeds taught member 200 powers hawaii making council subject federal law lawyers academy harvard schools striking pharmacy veto stanford citizens consumer amendment violation appellate laws victories containing previously
46:30
president applause assistant commented commission distinction was law 000 navy book john read alan york 1999 thank please served school stuart welcome harvard officer stewart attorney morrison
47:00
read case fisher incendiary remembering affirmative let file court brief draft today begin front debate values action supreme biggest lawyers lawsuit academic question concrete practices
47:30
texas admission 10 top supposed university high start class equal clause little anyone fisher school stuart abigail program injured violated programs graduates guarantees explaining protection connection undergraduate
48:00
texas school applies business academic graduates individuals program university ranks places guarantee high state something many necessarily preferred anybody
48:30
admitting university necessarily interesting competitive individuals ten top 80s lee bad rank texas brawn deals people thanks scored brains reasons besides schools highest criteria probably students athletes musicians pedagogic
49:00
texas program schools graduate university undergraduate 10 top aren else state place works people single simply enough around country national anything universities
49:30
high school largely texas legislature economically done based white aware works highly racial blacks social schools required patterns perfectly hispanics completely segregated residential segregation
50:00
racial diversity sufficient minorities university significant 10 top able they went title texas using study within period blamed groups school decided numbers adopting holistic approach concluded something
50:30
index stuart involved boxes race academic average consists 80 point combination number achievement 11 box axis single another tenure pick grade
51:00
factor six factors achievement understanding circumstances point grade total index number single things coming points called special personal athletic combined although included specific leadership recognized
51:30
number box gets numbers undergraduate circumstances end need race total music based final people bottom denied across program ability admitted specific reference everybody intersection
52:00
students admitted different depending obviously determination 60 80 90 10 top goal mass talk years quota turns desire numbers holistic addition critical approach
52:30
attend texas people actually minorities university state believes question means bring difficulties goal careful statistics 90 numbers difficult admitted little diverse
53:00
part large numbers admitted impact additional admittedly much americans small impossible hispanics gets strange preferred race determine exactly african
53:30
preference much slight numbers hand americans second proximate plaintiff help defendants top approach case 10 holistic wait important african things
54:00
sides figures grounds accepting important significant much case kind court irony terms thing proof saying proves argued walesa narrow numbers parties arguing
54:30
comply plaintiff gruber diversity end significant view arguing interesting particularly fact showing racial much saying broadly influence factor side burden court
55:00
specific academic plaintiff significant achievement programming six put box don high miss index score goals burden impact enough fisher gotten general showing highest question admitted
55:30
might system admitted specific unassigned difficulty got run help miss much tell else race afoul based irony goals result anyone harmed fisher gotten scoring creates another problem numbers argument michigan possible
56:00
program admitted texas arguments university reconstruct else event tried maybe clear admit summer people number future prevent forward regular lawsuit whether anybody actually happened possible
56:30
monetary something completed injunction university application ms fee far 100 item paid aware class thing range sought damage fisher future action already claimed program damages seeking problem standing
57:00
clear activity amendment emotional university circumstances isn right money state texas wants claim thing versus titled people passed unless engage waived called lawyers clearly damages getting feedback eleventh prevents
57:30
case show presented conferences intentional constitution sat hard four three court irony means clear damage supreme violate damages someone seeking getting thought deciding entitled problems violation something
58:00
case justicees certainly potential solicitor university tie act took fact fifth court kagan texas eight elena order remedy appeals fischer dubious general sitting despite circuit problems supported
58:30
prove discriminated interested minorities historically nevertheless may long took true case among court might texas asians harmed breeze chinese pointed periods history japanese
59:00
population high texas asians school numbers 61 16 able apply aside class asian college another overall leaving problem graduate american graduates constitute percentage university
59:30
rationale obviously minorities percentage sufficient university get let much else clay court roger entry higher couple points supreme include despite attempt accepted admitted everybody diversity
01:00:00
class universities alone entering criteria account structure achievement decide able taken academic
01:00:30
texas plaintiff
01:01:00
americans diversity hispanics rationale admissions university 10 top okay race easy gave texas quota accept second system answer regard besides reasons earlier without officer african increase adequate entirely
01:01:30
essay students arrested american education subjected kind grew fact black front thing expect lawyer police member needed reader strike ghetto become decided student getting anybody african personal
01:02:00
supremely disregard individual university indication inexperience able sure case kind many race fact essay shown court texas every greece reader wishes spirit narrow someone despite problem respects litigants
01:02:30
quick united citizens floor wondered discussion open example pockmarked thank akp broadly rick forth assembly much
01:03:00
need facts disclosed university affirmative transparency much alan point based three eight clegg parts leave quick sounds select robert better listen action reason points talking america minutes dialogue
01:03:30
system preferences proportion completely information transparency bug move idea essay realm maybe really talking looking forward hundred believe secondly whatever holistic operation individual
01:04:00
students race sympathetic application six discretionary unsuccessfully lot put the admit whole people connor really eubank trying shaped periods justice looking systems forward hundred everyone eligible criteria profound academic contrary particular mechanical
01:04:30
people diversity preference preferences backgrounds institutions the vast grew fact upper seems feels class middle police simply looking systems analogy ghettos problem wealthy getting african arrested majority americans receiving selective
01:05:00
decide anything university experience educational disagreement big deal need save poor alan case shaky state reach great agree proper without standing anywhere worsened potential disturbing legitimacy
01:05:30
case reach reached simmons citizens juvenile ve roe cut ago wade else true many court roper might taxes people versus united coming tunnel morris supreme shouldn
01:06:00
case cases serious problem principles policymaking bit shot body point court helps under cause reach maybe large decide little things extent broader reached anytime evolved
01:06:30
20 years politicians institution every transparency systematically rest maybe works racial failed lead assist action impose society another details book country problem 16 remedies attacked publicly american major component terrified pen suggested stretching applicants politician grips university affirmative preferences ban
01:07:00
spoke comments change supreme something preferences 100 ain slow next alan years allen court brief sewer roger brick local limit racial branch policy unless
01:07:30
stewart relevant decision relegated basically significant gaps huge rick texas stage merits issues scores fisher ethics gotten talking parties abigail ability whether
01:08:00
something arguments everything percentage population instructive put lot alan else foot case shoe court texas agree asians decide general footnote argument standing
01:08:30
ivy thing jewish league academic achievement ve 75 50 ago anti body left mean years kinds things quotas nobody student appeared addition discriminated justification
01:09:00
different matter historical quarterbacks scholarships discriminate yeah rate tuba rich kind race defer moral legal basis texas happy people alumni alumnus reached schools whether players question
01:09:30
comes ticketed deferring university structuring discrimination 60 50 ole two way ago miss race rice sure okay alan defer texas wants years thing racial general waiting classes deciding
01:10:00
many study studies perplexing completely contradictory cd tape read none talk child senate scores briefs proves chance courts another subject reports district
01:10:30
court supreme supposed studies question contradictory lot deal fine book read bunch wrong based study bricks indeed briefs appear answer matter decided invalid thought without problem
01:11:00
precedent particular university legislative legislature transparency 70 sat sit least texas agree aspect anyone extent stuart perhaps thought studies consider identify decision actually programs preceding important conscious presented
01:11:30
known wonderful renegade discovery litigation transparency ms isn tell kept money facts court maybe order people asking result seemed secret fisher always supreme unclear knitted program details getting
01:12:00
education hispanics microphone recognizes affiliation congressional end may let rest gets wait race years thank woman peggy leave thing please higher census diverse covered chelsea identify covering audience conundrum questions
01:12:30
race hispanics receiving considered affirmative distinguished 60s late used kids began racer multi factor stuart action anymore started colleges checking directed involved
01:13:00
people hispanics although diagnosis population socioeconomically ve low leg idea rent poor maybe logic legacy blacks needed trying quickly opposed question extended
01:13:30
people especially sometimes california egalitarian prescription ve rest best bloc stop often began point texas fluid thing course racial system harmed spoils reason voting benefit evolved growing powerful political diagnosis hispanics
01:14:00
question probably gentleman criterion everything affiliation lot ask box cato name right might saying events hankin retired outside stephen assumes consider identify
01:14:30
need price therefore university achievement administered pay idea best type every throw people society service willing divvied whether provided academic determine education
01:15:00
lot really education discussion university affirmative may need best fact event clear times people things pretty action absence weakest question customers situation
01:15:30
college customers education remaining definitely beneficiaries duke move able many money guess today ahead enter people states really united appear higher degree classes succeed directed academic laughter
01:16:00
money college people anything poor inaudible program government pay university market gives system treated place quick
01:16:30
right catholic guess law changing policy humphrey lady hand graduate system criterion name hi understand price recent firm kim aclu
01:17:00
may important graduates regardless assumption conversation stem part point guess plays raise board class middle issues anyone across related arrested generally fallacies
01:17:30
race guess preferences issue certainly aren transparent athletic transparency point biggest need support question kind
01:18:00
scholarships legacies athletic preference university significant sad long much else raise least state issue people debate really giving things factor degree school divulge subject staying someone identify anything required
01:18:30
ability question based university viewpoints irrelevant may bring raise racer throw accept debate rather things public factor subject welcome account whether grounds moreover criteria academic different admission presumably
01:19:00
supposed something preferences differently intelligent transparency lot got buy mind much alan keep ugly team civil agree people debate racism public extent recent special whether benefit problem uniquely treating
01:19:30
social science evidence ridiculous discriminate indeterminate race right allen court stuck kinds basis equal thing people clause carved forest aceves wanted supreme reasons depends exactly shouldn sciences different exception protection
01:20:00
stem point majors hispanic gentlemen quickpoint isn need blue black shirt maybe grass little appear chance misled college wanting colleges students becoming
01:20:30
institute washington percentage university interesting discrimination born tell days wages thing people george member groups weblog numbers squyres various account accounts previous question patterns woodstock
01:21:00
worse slavery getting cultural complicated discrimination ve jim era crow years great causes rather system better worked social result society numbers welfare
01:21:30
anything community acceptable particular correlation fundamentally lot bad show four fact essays parent social become society wedlock african science children american religion morality
01:22:00
firestorm absolutely got recognized achievement politically increasingly man rest long name brave issue 1960s sides aisle daniel dennis coming rogers career social pointed nothing patrick stopped problem moynihan families becoming criticism incorrect
01:22:30
dropping rosenberg law pathology gentleman correlation discrimination show home next blog john last name right close sorry father couple strong longer school writing trouble getting whether without growing minutes ll whatever question remember
01:23:00
end book race really preferences incomparable got call seems given based mainly stuart served reasons banning calling thought question surprise strongest magisterial
01:23:30
ll much never really schoolhouse preferences rid ask end door obey veto kind grew race book moved stood state along middle things narrow heckler propose argument question governor specific
01:24:00
limiting preferences interesting middleweight transparency socioeconomic 13 tap lot aid size race wide taste three talked number trying outlaw points keeping argument reference financial abolishing
01:24:30
argument race based legal policy unconstitutional 17 18 try aid fast name apply answer wouldn illegal chapter example chapters financial questions admissions preferences
01:25:00
chapters laughter important mismatched preferences conversation 10 17 end top buy kid find ways long book read went bring facts texas worse shrink reason fashion planned opinions consider
01:25:30
race based benefit analysis scholarships preferences why gut cost easy point court space black clear sketch talked racial supreme haulers bidding without students affluent hobbyhorse encourages mismatches
01:26:00
race need based people thought offering end pen run slam much dunk claim money avoid might second things around handle ordeal instead harvard whether whatever necessary preference campaigning preferences universities scholarships socioeconomic
01:26:30
question children second occasion plug high chandler without gentleman row name consultants getting middle born married directly cheryl last tech right
01:27:00
married many getting children eventually relationships 30 yet 120 born favor child years roger maybe family people intact stable company anybody without evidence marriage families divorced mandatory transform
01:27:30
issue solution statistic everything preferences interesting 18 old gap cry much real kids fact years people racial better parent reason schools families opposite pressure enormous
01:28:00
yeah couples african family american kids directly school traceable implosion black number
01:28:30
born kid maybe available understand possibilities 72 book joke read ones away couples numbers wedlock explain married african disaster national children divorced americans
01:29:00
mismatch audience let applause affirmative performance universities why help span sign glad join being thank floor today lunch hurts admit second sander copies stuart action another richard outside meeting speakers indended students
01:29:30
applause inaudible conversations

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)